FOI

end impunity, Media News, News, Press Release

Press Release – IPC Condemns Continous Attack on Journalists by Security in Kogi House

The International Press Centre, Lagos-Nigeria condemns the continuous attack on journalists by security men at the Kogi state government house. According to reports from Punch Newspaper, “For the second time in one month, the Kogi state government house security men on Wednesday, 11th October allegedly brutalized Mr. Wale Odunsi, an editor with Daily Post (online publication) in an effort to honour the invitation of the online media team of the state governor, Alhaji Yahaya Bello, which is headed by the Senior Special Assistant to the Governor, James Minister.” The Director of IPC, Mr. Lanre Arogundade in a statement described the assault on journalists by security men attached to the Kogi state government house as a great concern to the press and all its stakeholders.   “Only three weeks ago, Mr. Segun Salami of Channels Television was reportedly beaten up, dragged on the floor and locked up in the government house cell. This calls for serious concern and attention by all concerned parties,” Arogundade said. IPC is therefore urging the Kogi state Governor and the State Commissioner of Police to immediately probe this growing trend of attack on journalists within the premises of the State house and take necessary actions against the erring security personnel, in order to forestall a re-occurrence. SGD: Melody Akinjiyan Program Assistant/Safety Desk Officer IPC melodyakinjiyan@ipcng.org +2348162206470

end impunity, Media News, News, Press Release, Welcome to The NIGERIAN JOURNALIST INTERNET RIGHT INITIATIVE BLOG (NJIRI)

World Day of Information: IPC launches Nigerian Journalists’ Internet Rights Initiative (NJIRI), calls for safety of journalists Online

Press Release As the global community marks the “International Day for Universal Access to Information” (IDUAI), today, the International Press Centre (IPC), Lagos-Nigeria has announced the launch of the “The Nigerian Journalists Internet Rights Initiative (NJIRI)”. Director of IPC, Mr. Lanre Arogundade said the main objectives of the NJIRI are to defend Internet and digital rights as well as the safety of journalists online. Mr. Arogundade explained further that the one-year campaign will aim to advance the right of freedom of expression for online journalists in Nigeria based on the premise that internet spaces and online platforms should be safe and free of institutional limitations for journalists and other media practitioners to use as mediums of information and engagement. Mr. Arogundade said it was imperative to demand for the safety of journalists online on the occasion of the #AccessToInfoDay given the worrisome trend of indiscriminate attacks on journalists, bloggers and others. He said these objectives accord with principles of #AccessToInfoDay given its relevance to the new 2030 Development Agenda, and in particular the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target 16.10 which calls for ensuring public access to information and protection of fundamental freedoms. NJIIRI is being supported by International Freedom of Exchange (IFEX), an international freedom of expression organization headquartered in Toronto, Canada. It is expected that through the project, the right to freedom of expression for online journalism in Nigeria is respected, protected and guaranteed within the medium and long term. As part of the project a research report titled “Issues in frameworks, freedom of expression and Internet rights in Nigeria: A baseline research by the Nigerian Journalists Internet Rights Initiative (NJIRI)” has been commissioned and is being reviewed following which there will be a public presentation and dissemination to stakeholder groups in the freedom of expression community. It is also envisaged that the research report would play a critical role in the NJIRI campaign as it shall serve as referral document for engagement with statutory bodies and related stakeholders groups under the NJIRI. The IPC project recognizes that Universal access is central to the UN’s World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), which recognized the ambition of developing inclusive Knowledge Societies. “Accessibility” is also recognized as one of the four principles in UNESCO’s ROAM model of Internet Universality. Universal access to information is bound up with the right to seek and receive information, which is an integral part of the right to freedom of expression. It is covered by Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Toyin Ayoade Social Media/Communications Officer IPC, Lagos-Nigeria Tel: +234 (0) 8114503887 Email: tayoade@ipcng.org International Press Centre (IPC), Lagos, Nigeria IPC is Nigeria’s foremost media capacity development organization. www.ipcng.org l www.twitter.com/IPCng l www.facebook.com/ipc.nigeria lwww.youtube.com/ipcng l Google+ : Ipc Ng    

Media News, News, Press Release

AFEX Calls for Immediate End to Impunity for Crimes against Journalists in Africa

July 5, 2017 The African Freedom of Expression Exchange (AFEX), a network of African freedom of expression groups, has expressed serious concerns about the increased incidents of attacks against journalists, media practitioners and free expression advocates on the continent, and urged governments in the region to step up efforts to safeguard free speech online and offline. Members of AFEX lamented the deteriorating freedom of expression situation in Africa at the network’s 5th Annual General Meeting which was held in Montreal, Canada, on June 16, 2017, on the sidelines of the IFEX Strategy Conference and General Meeting. . AFEX deplored the increasing incidents of killings, physical attacks, arbitrary arrests and detentions, threats and harassment of journalists, media professionals and activists in Africa as a threat towards the enjoyment of free expression and the ultimate development of the continent. In particular, it condemned the abuse of public power and legal provisions by highly connected state and non-state actors to muzzle freedom of expression and stifle critical journalism for narrow personal and political gains. The Network noted that sadly, most of these violations perpetrated against journalists and activists are left unpunished due to the deep-seated culture of impunity and entitlement in the continent. In the past three years, several journalists have been killed with total impunity, a development which has had a chilling effect on the enjoyment of freedom of expression rights by African citizens. The killing of journalists is the surest way of silencing dissent or even intimidating journalists into self-censorship, thus further emboldening perpetrators of these heinous crimes to recommit such violent acts. It re-stated its “strong condemnation of all acts of violence meted to journalists and freedom of expression advocates in the region” and called on “governments in Africa to commit to ensuring that journalists carry out their legitimate duties freely without any intimidation whatsoever.” AFEX also condemned the use of “spurious charges” against journalists by state or non-state actors to counter dissent, which undermines and weakens democracy. The Network therefore called for the abolition of all criminal defamation laws and the decriminalization of press offenses by African countries that are yet to do so. It also expressed alarm over the increasing threats to freedom of expression online, including the practice of content filtering, restrictive cybercrime laws and even internet shutdowns. Accordingly, AFEX called on governments in Africa to respect their citizens’ right to share and access information through the Internet. On efforts being made at both regional and international level to promote freedom of expression rights both offline and online, AFEX welcomed the joint commitment by the African Union (AU) and the European Union (EU) – at the 12th African Union (AU) – European Union (EU) Human Rights Dialogue that took place on January 10, 2017 – to promote and protect freedom of expression and the right of access to information in the digital age. It also applauded the fact that both EU and AU have welcomed the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights (ACHPR’s) Resolution on the Right to Freedom of Information and Expression on the Internet in Africa, while emphasizing that the same rights that people have offline must also be protected online. AFEX urged governments in countries that are heading to the polls in 2017 and beyond, to ensure that journalists are free to cover the electoral process freely, adding that “attacks on journalists and suppression of freedom of expression rights during elections undermine the democratic tenets of any country.” It gave its full support to the ongoing efforts by the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information in Africa, Advocate Pansy Tlakula, to develop Guidelines on Access to Information and Elections in Africa, under the auspices of the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights, with a view to guaranteeing free and fair elections on the continent and the overall strengthening of democratic governance in Africa. At the end of their meeting, AFEX members paid tribute to media personnel, civil society activists and human rights defenders who have been put behind bars unjustly or even killed for standing for cherished democratic values and fundamental human rights. Regarding the growth of the network, AFEX welcomed the Freedom of Expression Institute (FXI) based in South Africa as a new member increasing AFEX membership from 12 to 13. The meeting congratulated a member of the AFEX Steering Committee, Mr Gilbert Sendwugwa, Executive Director of the African Freedom of Information Centre (AFIC), on his election to serve on the IFEX Council for the next two years during the IFEX General Meeting. — AFEX is a continental network of some of the leading freedom of expression organizations across East, West, Central and Southern Africa that are members of the Toronto-based global network IFEX. For more information about AFEX, please contact Felicia Anthonio info@africafex.org, or visit the AFEX website at www.africafex.org. Read more at: http://www.africafex.org/access-to-information/afex-calls-for-immediate-end-to-impunity-for-crimes-against-journalists-in-africa

Media News, News, Opportunities for Journalists, Press Release

IPC Calls For Halt to Harassment of Premium Times; Calls for Stakeholders’ Dialogue on Media Freedom

The International Press Centre (IPC), Lagos-Nigeria has described the invasion of the premises of Premium Times in Abuja and the subsequent arrest of its Publisher, Dapo Olorunyomi and the judiciary correspondent, Evelyn Okakwu by armed police men on the night of January 19, 2017, as an unacceptable assault on freedom of the Press. Director of IPC, Mr. Lanre Arogundade said in a statement today (January 20, 2017), that the attack on Premium Times as well as the harassment of other journalistsin recent times are completely antithetical to democratic values and norms at the core of which are the rights to free speech and media freedom. “Any government that makes the Press its enemy, will invariably turn to be the enemy of the people as was recently the case in The Gambia where Yaya Jammeh was rejected by the people due to his constant attacks on the Press among other human rights violations”, the IPC Director warned. According to the IPC Director, the Police should not allow itself to be used to settle scores by vested interests, in this case the Army authorities,which have already made public its disagreement with Premium Times over certain publications by the media outlet pertaining to the office of the Chief of Army Staff. “The Police should however make public its reasons for the raid of Premium Times and the arrest of Olorunyomi and Okakwu if they believe that it is not connected with the dispute with the Army authorities”, he said further. Mr. Arogundade advised the Army authorities to seek legal redress or make use of the instrumentality of the media regulatory agencies, should they be convinced that there had been professional misconduct on the part of Premium Times and its editors. The IPC Director, said however that the organization welcomes the fact that the Police authorities promptly released the arrested Publisher and Reporter following public outcry. The IPC Director, also said that recent developments have made it imperative to have a national stakeholders’ dialogue involving media institutions, the security and law enforcement agencies, the media regulatory agencies etc, to discuss measures for safeguarding press freedom and the sustenance of democratic values. SGD: Melody Akinjiyan Safety Alert Desk Officer, IPC House 11, Dideolu Court, 2nd gate b/stop, Ogba Lagos Tel: +2348162206470  

Media News, News

Freedom of Information Act and the Fight Against Corruption

Despite the difficulties of trying to operationalise FOI legislation, it is a good thing for the country as we work to remove the obstacles. More information well utilised will be in the best interest of the country and its citizens on the long run. There may be red faces here and there but the transition to a better Nigeria is not an event but a process. The process of implementing FOI may be a tortuous journey but we must not lose sight of the end goal. An open society is in our best interest. I was invited to a workshop last week to review the level of progress in the compliance of government agencies to the Freedom of Information Act. It was a crucial opportunity for me to bring myself up to speed with some of the happenings within the civil society arena in Nigeria. As part of my preparations for the discussions, I had to read the Freedom of Information Act all over again. It is one legislation that will give you consolation about the amount of resources and sacrifices that were put into it. I recall the exchanges between respected civil society leaders and many politicians during the Obasanjo regime. It is gratifying that after eleven years of intense advocacy, reason triumphed, and the bill was passed into an act, which was later signed into law by President Jonathan. The passage of the FOI Act remains a very commendable effort, but one wonders why its implementation remains a daunting challenge. So far, only sixty out of hundreds of parastatals and government agencies have been able to set up compliance structures as prescribed by the law. Although some people argue that the FOI Act is too much of an idealistic legislation, because of its civil society origin, the law is the law. Rather than dwell on the idealism argument, I will rather wonder whether the drafters of the law took the Nigerian context into consideration. Some of these law’s paragraphs are uprooted from foreign jurisdictions and foisted on contexts like ours, without adapting it accordingly. I will use a few instances to illustrate my argument, as one tries to understand the law further and chart a way forward. First is that I consider the law as somewhat ambiguous. For instance, the objectives are “to make public records and information more freely available, provide public access to public records and information, protect public records and information to the extent it consists with public interest and protection of personal privacy, protect serving public officials from adverse consequences of disclosing certain kinds of information without authorisation and establish procedure for the achievement of the purposes and related matters.” Although the word ‘public’ was mentioned more than 114 times throughout the text of the law, there was nowhere it was clarified. The assumption will probably be that everyone reading the law will have the same understanding of what is public. Odd! In a country where many private things are done under the cover of public interest, it will be important to offer some explanation as to what the law means by the word ‘public’. Even within the country, there are slight differences between what is considered public or private. What is private in Yola, may be considered public in Yenagoa. The demand for access to public information to be seen as a human right is great, but it will take a while. The target for public institutions to respond to FOI requests within four days is excellent. However, in a situation where many agencies are not connected to the Internet or their servers are perpetually down, what do you do? The whole idea of proactive public disclosures sounds very good, at least with the amendment of the Official Secrecy Act of 1911. Yet the culture of secrecy prevails in the civil service. It is either as a result of ignorance or wilful negligence. It is either that the bureaucrats are deliberately hiding the information, or that citizens are not yet aware of their rights. Today, very few government agencies have functional websites that are updated regularly. There are very few designated portals or platforms from where the public can obtain reliable information. For FOI and anti-corruption reforms to meet, there is a role for anti-corruption institutions. How many of them have so far established functional FOI units within their offices? Do EFCC, ICPC, Code of Conduct Bureau, Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) disclose information proactively? What is the integrity of the information obtained? Whose responsibility is it to bring the government agencies up to speed with proactive disclosure and build the capacity of citizens on productive advocacy? Now let us talk briefly about the relationship between a Freedom of Information regime and the war against corruption. The persistence of corruption, despite the application of several remedies, means that proper diagnosis might not have been carried out. So before we rush to the discussion of the relationship between (anti-)corruption and open society, let us try to find out the underlying causes of corruption in our country. No doubt the strain of corruption in Nigeria is a peculiar one that inhibits growth. Many countries like ours, that are plagued with corruption, have managed to continue to grow. A country like Indonesia has a thriving crude oil and palm oil industry amidst high levels of corruption. I do not need to overemphasise the relationship between increased availability of information in the public domain and accountability. However, that relationship is not automatic. Disclosure of information for increased transparency is a necessary but not sufficient condition for accountability. With transparent action, citizens will be expected to demand accountability. Information therefore become tools and ammunitions for advocacy with which citizens can demand a relationship of accountability from their leaders. A Freedom of Information regime will only provide us with the information, the rest is in our hands – the citizens. The ability to use the information the right way is another important thing. Often many people use

Media News, News

Nigeria: Freedom of the media under a watchful eye – Radio Deutsche Welle, July 7, 2015

Nigeria: Freedom of the media under a watchful eye – Radio Deutsche Welle, July 7, 2015 Despite strict government censorship, artists and the media in Nigeria are finding way to enjoy small amounts of freedom. Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari had focused his election campaign on “change” – and promised an overhaul. The opposition candidate Buhari convinced his constituency at the voting polls on March 28. “Many artists and intellectuals responded with relief,” noted Marc-André Schmachtel, director of the Goethe-Institut in the country’s economic and cultural metropolis, Lagos. Lola Shoneyin, one of Nigeria’s most renowned writers (“The Secret Lives of Baba Segi’s Wives”), even went so far as to campaign openly for Buhari. That comes as a surprise since, during the 1980s when Muhammadu Buhari ruled as a military dictator, he had applied a very tough policy against dissidents. But the fact that Nigerians have, for the first time, voted against a government perceived as being corrupt and incompetent has been welcomed by many artists. Even Shoneyin’s father, Literature Nobel Prize-laureate Wole Soyinka, who for a long time had strongly criticized Buhari’s presidential ambitions, accepted him in the end – albeit as the lesser evil. After Buhari’s election victory, he called on Nigerians to forgive him for his dictatorial past. A history of censorship Buhari follows a civilian president, but one who also had a mixed record when it came to freedom in cultural affairs and the media. In February 2015, the organization Reporters Without Borders warned that President Goodluck Jonathan’s evasive manner, when it came to the media and the rights of the public in general, was deeply worrying. Reports were becoming more frequent that domestic and foreign media reporting on the struggle against terrorism in northeastern Nigeria were being hampered in their work. Author Wole Soyinka. Copyright: imago/Gallo Images Nobel Prize laureate Wole Soyinke considers President Buhari the lesser of two evils Previously, the Nigerian military had made clear that it no longer wished to be criticized by the media for its unsuccessful strategy against the terrorist Islamist group, Boko Haram. After it had been reported that several generals had allegedly been sentenced by martial courts for presumably collaborating with the terrorists, soldiers impeded the delivery of a number of major newspapers for several days. They claimed that it wasn’t legally possible for newspapers to publish such security-sensitive information. Biased media control These examples, among others, demonstrate that, even 16 years after the current democratic constitution came into force, freedom of expression must be constantly fought for and defended by Nigerians. Whereas in the past, and even under military regimes, the printed media of Africa’s most populous state never shied away from making their points of view heard, the still relatively young private television and radio stations have come under particular pressure. They are ultimately overseen by the Nigerian Broadcasting Commission (NBC). “The problem is that the chairman is appointed solely by the president,” criticized Umar Saidu Tudunwada, a manager at the northern Nigerian commercial broadcaster, Radio Freedom. That’s why the NBC consistently promotes the position of the ruling party, he added. Since the government already directly controls the state media, it keeps an especially close eye on private media organizations, according to Tudunwada. Tudunwada is demanding that the NBC’s board be appointed by the parliament in the future, so that the president doesn’t make a single-handed decision. Caution with sensitive issues Furthermore, private newspapers and radio stations are often owned by members of the Nigerian elite, who are closely linked to one or another political party. Many reports are paid for directly by institutions, organizations or religious groups, or even produced by such groups themselves. In Nigeria, a deeply religious country, priests and imams assert direct pressure on the media. “If you are not careful, they mobilize the people to stir up trouble,” said Umar Saidu Tudunwada from Freedom Radio, whose headquarters are located in the strictly Islamic city of Kano. Particularly sensitive issues in the conservative provinces of northern Nigeria include religion, women’s rights and homosexuality, which is forbidden by law. Radio broadcasting continue to be the main source of information of Nigerians, and is hence very influential. That’s why Freedom Radio broadcast spots and discussions promoting peaceful conduct during the elections months ahead of time. “Together with other broadcasters, we’ve organized seminars for our journalists to enable them to report more sensitively on conflicts,” said Tudunwada. “That proved to be very successful, since hate speeches and provocation did not come up in our coverage.” Watching over ‘Nollywood’ Films produced in Nigeria enjoy particular popularity. Nigeria’s film industry, known as “Nollywood,” is now widely regarded as the world’s most prolific, behind the US and India. This popularity has caught the attention of the authorities, and the governing body officially refers to itself as a censorship board – the National Film and Video Censors Board. In general, the censors do their work unnoticed. But one of the few internationally acclaimed Nigerian films provoked an outcry in 2014. The NFVCB had banned the film “Half of a Yellow Sun” from being shown. The film, based on the novel by Chimamanda Adichie, is set during the Nigerian civil war and is about the separation the Republic of Biafra in the south east of the country, which is mainly inhabited by the Ibo people. After weeks of tug-of-war, intense public debates and agreements to cut a number of scenes, the censors finally agreed to let the film be screened. “That has triggered a broad debate on the role of censorship,” said Marc-André Schmachtel from the Goethe-Institut. “Many artists don’t want to give up their right to deal with history.” The influence of Boko Haram The Goethe-Institut itself has not seen direct restrictions concerning its work in Lagos. Nevertheless, there are issues that require special sensitivity, said Schmachtel: “When it comes to homosexuality, for example, we are very careful.” That’s why he prefers to screen a particular movie about the coming-out of young Kenyans in the German Consulate rather than in

Scroll to Top